Below are recent publications related to my current work.
A wide variety of design strategies, tools, and processes are used across the game industry. Prior work has shown that these
processes are often collaborative, with experts in different domains contributing to different parts of the whole. However,
the ways in which these professionals give and receive peer feedback have not yet been studied in depth. In this paper we
present results from interviews with industry professionals at two game studios, describing the ways they give feedback. We
propose a new, six step process that describes the full feedback cycle from making plans to receive feedback to reflecting and
acting upon that feedback. This process serves as a starting point for researchers studying peer feedback in games, and
allows for comparison of processes across different types of studios. It will also help studios formalize their understanding
of their own processes and consider alternative processes that might better fit their needs.
The rise of game streaming services has driven a complementary increase in research on such platforms. As this new area takes shape,
there is a need to understand the approaches being used in the space, and how common practices can be shared and replicated between
researchers with different disciplinary backgrounds. In this paper, we describe a formal literature review of game streaming research.
Papers were coded for their research focus, primary method, and type of data collected. Across the prior work we found three common themes:
(1) work that is readily supported by existing technical infrastructure, (2) work that does not require explicit technical support,
(3) and work that would benefit from further technical development. By identifying these needs in the literature, we take the first step
toward developing a research toolkit for game streaming platforms that can unify the breadth of methods being applied in the space.
Large-scale streaming platforms such as Twitch are becoming increasingly popular, but detailed audience-streamer interaction dynamics
remain unexplored at scale. In this paper, we perform a mixed methods study on a dataset with over 12 million audience
chat messages and 45 hours of streamed video to understand audience participation and streamer performance on Twitch. We uncover five
types of streams based on size and audience participation styles, from small streams with close streamer-audience interactions
to massive streams with the stadium-style audiences. We discuss challenges and opportunities emerging for streamers and
audiences from each style and conclude by providing data-backed design implications that empower streamers, audiences, live streaming platforms, and game designers.
Chatbots have grown as a space for research and development in recent years due both to the realization of their commercial potential and to advancements in language processing that have facilitated more natural conversations.
However, nearly all chatbots to date have been designed for dyadic, one-on-one communication with users. In this paper we present a comprehensive review of research on chatbots supplemented by a review of commercial and independent
chatbots. We argue that chatbots’ social roles and conversational capabilities beyond dyadic interactions have been underexplored, and that expansion into this design space could support richer social interactions in online
communities and help address the longstanding challenges of maintaining, moderating, and growing these communities. In order to identify opportunities beyond dyadic interactions, we used research-through-design methods to generate more
than 400 concepts for new social chatbots, and we present seven categories that emerged from analysis of these ideas.
Ensuring high-quality, civil social interactions remains a vexing challenge in many online spaces. In the present work, we introduce a novel approach to address this problem: using psychologically “embedded” CAPTCHAs containing stimuli
intended to prime positive emotions and mindsets. An exploratory randomized experiment (N = 454 Mechanical Turk workers) tested the impact of eight new CAPTCHA designs implemented on a simulated, politically charged comment
thread. Results revealed that the two interventions that were the most successful at activating positive affect also significantly increased the positivity of tone and analytical complexity of argumentation in participants’ responses. A focused follow-up experiment (N = 120 Mechanical Turk
workers) revealed that exposure to CAPTCHAs featuring image sets previously validated to evoke low-arousal positive emotions significantly increased the positivity of sentiment and the levels of complexity and social connectedness in
participants’ posts. We offer several explanations for these results and discuss the practical and ethical implications of designing interfaces to influence discourse in online forums.
People with health concerns go to online health support groups to obtain help and advice. To do so, they frequently disclose personal details, many times in public. Although research in non-health settings
suggests that people self-disclose less in public than in private, this pattern may not apply to health support groups where people want to get relevant help. Our work examines how the use of private and public channels influences members’ self-disclosure in an
online cancer support group, and how channels moderate the influence of self-disclosure on reciprocity and receiving support. By automatically measuring people’s self-disclosure at scale, we found
that members of cancer support groups revealed more negative self-disclosure in the public channels compared to the private channels. Although one’s self-disclosure leads others to self-disclose and to
provide support, these effects were generally stronger in the private channel. These channel effects probably occur because the public channels are the primary venue for support exchange, while the
private channels are mainly used for follow-up conversations. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of our work.
Online communities provide a forum for rich social interaction and identity development for billions of internet users worldwide. In order to manage these communities, platform owners have increasingly turned to commercial
content moderation, which includes both the use of moderation algorithms and the employment of professional moderators, rather than user-driven moderation, to detect and respond to anti-normative behaviors such as harassment and
spread of offensive content. We present findings from semi-structured interviews with 56 volunteer moderators of online communities across three platforms (Twitch, Reddit, and Facebook), from which we derived a generalized model
categorizing the ways moderators engage with their communities and explaining how these communities develop as a result. This model contains three processes: being and becoming a moderator; moderation tasks, actions, and responses;
and rules and community development. In this work, we describe how moderators contribute to the development of meaningful communities, both with and without algorithmic support.
Bots, or programs designed to engage in social spaces and perform automated tasks, are typically understood as automated tools or as social "chatbots." In this paper, we consider bots’ place alongside users within diverse
communities in the emerging social ecosystem of audience participation platforms, guided by concepts from structural role theory. We perform a large-scale analysis of bot activity levels on Twitch, finding that they
communicate at a much greater rate than other types of users.We build on prior literature on bot functionalities to identify the roles bots play on Twitch, how these roles vary across different types of Twitch communities,
and how users engage with them and vice versa. We conclude with a discussion of where opportunities lie to re-conceptualize and re-design bots as social actors who help communities grow and evolve.
Research in computer-supported cooperative work has historically focused on behaviors of individuals at scale, using frames of interpersonal interaction such as Goffman’s theories of self-presentation. These
frames prioritize research detailing the characteristics, personal identities, and behaviors of large numbers of interacting individuals, while the social identity concepts that lead to intra- and inter-group dynamics
have received far less attention. We argue that the emergent properties of self-categorization and social identity, which are particularly fluid and complex in online spaces, provide a complementary perspective with
which to re-examine traditional topics in social computing. We discuss the applicability of the Social Identity Perspective to both established and new research domains in CSCW, proposing alternative perspectives on selfpresentation,
social support, collaboration, misbehavior, and leadership. We propose a set of methodological considerations derived from this body of theories and accompanying empirical work. We close by considering
how broad concepts and lessons from social identity provide a valuable lens for inspiring future work in CSCW.
Livestreamed APGs (audience participation games) allow stream viewers to participate meaningfully in a streamer’s gameplay. However, streaming interfaces are not designed
to meet the needs of audience participants. In order to explore the game design space of APGs, we provided three game development teams with an audience participation interface
development toolkit. Teams iteratively developed and tested APGs over the course of ten months, and then reflected on common design challenges across the three games. Six challenges
were identified: latency, screen sharing, attention management, player agency, audience-streamer relationships, and shifting schedules. The impact of these challenges on players were
then explored through external playtests. We conclude with implications for the future of APG design.
In this paper we explore audience participation games, a type of game that draws spectators into a role where they can impact gameplay in meaningful ways. "To better
understand this design space, we developed several versions of two prototype games as design probes. We livestreamed them to an online audience in order to develop
a framework for audience motivations and participation styles, to explore ways in which mechanics can affect audience members’ sense of agency, and to identify promising
design spaces. Our results show the breadth of opportunities and challenges that designers face in creating engaging Audience
Online communities have the potential to be supportive, cruel, or anywhere in between. The development of positive norms for interaction can help users build bonds, grow, and
learn. Using millions of messages sent in Twitch chatrooms, we explore the effectiveness of methods for encouraging and discouraging specific behaviors, including
taking advantage of imitation effects through setting positive examples and using moderation tools to discourage antisocial behaviors. Consistent with aspects of imitation theory and deterrence theory, users imitated examples of
behavior that they saw, and more so for behaviors from high status users. Proactive moderation tools, such as chat modes which restricted the ability to post certain content,
proved effective at discouraging spam behaviors, while reactive bans were able to discourage a wider variety of behaviors. This work considers the intersection of tools, authority, and types of behaviors, offering a new frame
through which to consider the development of moderation strategies.